Compensatory pension
Translation generated by AI. Access the original version
Amount and duration after change in the economic capacity of the parties
The Supreme Court (SC) has resolved a case in which a former couple was discussing theamount and duration of the compensatory pension after their divorce. At the time they signed the regulatory agreement, the ex-husband agreed to pay his ex-wife40% of his future retirement pension for life, as compensation for the economic imbalance that the divorce caused her.
Years later, both retired and, upon realizing that theeconomic situation had changed (now both pensions were similar), the ex-husband went to court requesting theextinction of said pension. He argued that the ex-wife already hadsufficient resources and that continuing to pay the compensatory pension could leave him with very low income. The first instance judge understood that, although thecompensatory pension should be maintained, it should only be paid for two more years, to prevent the ex-husband from having an insufficient minimum livelihood. The ex-wife disagreed and appealed. The Provincial Court thought that, although the situation had changed
, there were no reasons to extinguish the pension., there were no reasons to extinguish the pension, but yes to reduce its amount to only75 euros per month, and also to keep it indefinitely, which in part was worse for the ex-wife in terms of monthly money, but better because it ensured lifelong payment.
When the case reached the Supreme Court, it analyzed if the Court of Appeals could make that decision, since the ex-wife had only appealed to obtain a pension without a time limit and not to discuss the amount, and the ex-husband had not even appealed. The Supreme Court recalls that a courtcannot worsen the situation of the only one who appeals (principle of "no worsening"), unless the other party has also appealed. Thus, partly confirming the ex-wife's claim, it resolves that the pension will be the oneset by the first judgment(40% for two years) and, only after that time, it will be reduced to 75 euros per month indefinitely, as established by the Court of Appeals.
If you find yourself in a situation similar to the one described, our professionals can provide you with the necessary assistance and take the actions that may be relevant.RELATED CONTENT
-
Settlement of marital property
Claim between spouses for marital debt after modification of the matrimonial property regime
-
Parental authority
Criminal responsibility for not picking up the teenage child who has left
-
Guardianship and custody
Hearing of the minor in processes where there are signs of gender-based violence
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.