Unauthorized works
Translation generated by AI. Access the original version
Implicit authorization to the president to exercise legal actions
The Supreme Court (SC) has resolved a typical conflict of a community of property owners when some works were carried out without permission on uncovered terraces of a building in Ibiza. The community argued that those terraces were common elements , while the owners and tenants of premises 3 and 4 argued that they were for private use . In that context, work was done (such as refurbishing slabs and installing parasol-type structures) without authorization from the community.
First, at an extraordinary meeting , the community already discussed the matter, requested that everything be returned to its original state , and warned that, if it was not resolved, it could end up in legal actions. Later, at a second extraordinary meeting, an item was added to the agenda regarding "enclosure and work enclosure and construction on "common elements" in relation to those premises, and it was approved (by majority and with the vote against the affected owner) to file a lawsuit to compel the restoration of the terrace as it was and to remove enclosures and occupations.
The Provincial Court of the Balearic Islands annulled not only the agreement, but the entire board , because it understood that the agenda did not expressly state that a judicial claim was going to be authorized nor the authorization for the president to file it.
The Supreme Court, however, corrects that criterion and considers that the agenda was clear enough to "cover" the decision to sue for those unauthorized works, without requiring extreme formalities. In addition, it reminds that the president legally represents the community and that, in this case, the agreement implicitly included the authorization to act in court. For all these reasons, it annuls the judgment of the Provincial Court and returns the proceedings so that it decides the rest of the issues of the lawsuit (no longer being able to overturn the board for that reason).
In situations of controversy related to the execution of works in private elements, our professionals can advise you on the defense of your interests
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.